Saturday 15 June 2013

And What Have The Qaadiyanees Got To Say After This?!

If Allaah تعالى wanted a Prophet after our Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, then Ibraaheem ibn Muhammad would have lived after him (Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم)!

Narrated Ismaa`eel: I asked Ibn Abi `Aufaa رضي الله عنه: Did you see Ibraaheem, the son of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم? He said: “Yes, but he died in his early childhood. Had there been a Prophet after Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم then his son would have lived, but there is no Prophet after him.”

[Saheeh al-Bukhaaree (6194)]

Ibn Abi `Aufaa رضي الله عنه said: “Were there a Prophet after the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, his son (Ibraaheem) would not have died.”

[Musnad of Imaam Ahmad (19109) and it is “Saheeh” as per the conditions of al-Bukhaaree and Muslim.

This Hadeeth, even though it appears to be Maqoof (statement of the Companion), it is still treated as Marfoo` (as a statement of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم) because he (Ibn Abi `Aufaa) could not have said it from his own because this is from the matters of the Unseen in which no personal opinion is allowed.]

Anas bin Maalik رضي الله عته said: “Had Ibraaheem, the son of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, been alive, He would have been Siddeeqan Nabiyyaa (man of Truth (and) a Prophet).” [Musnad Ahmad (12358, 13985) and Shaikh al-Albaanee graded the chain of this narration as “Saheeh” upon the condition of Muslim. See al-Dha`eefah (1/388)]

No comments:

Post a Comment